SentraMind

Platform · Private AI Core

Your Security Data. Your Private AI Core.

A customer-controlled reasoning service for every SentraMind agent crew—deployed inside your environment, sized to your workload, and designed to operate without a hyperscale GPU cluster.

The model assists interpretation. Source systems, deterministic controls and authorized people remain authoritative.

Design-partner roadmap This build contains no model runtime and calls no model — every model-shaped capability reports an explicit “model not configured” state. The architecture, model classes and hardware figures on this page are intended design and sizing targets: not measured results, and not a supported production specification.

Selected evidence in. Controlled outcomes out.. Raw stores remain authoritative. Agents send only the evidence needed for an approved task through policy and access controls.
Selected evidence in. Controlled outcomes out. Raw stores remain authoritative. Agents send only the evidence needed for an approved task through policy and access controls.
Bounded reasoning flowSelected evidence in. Controlled outcomes out.

Raw stores remain authoritative. Agents send only the evidence needed for an approved task through policy and access controls.

Customer-controlled environment · no public AI service required for normal private inference

  1. 01
    Identify the task

    An approved user or agent crew opens a defined security task.

  2. 02
    Minimize evidence

    Parsers and deterministic detectors select the smallest relevant context.

  3. 03
    Apply controls

    Access checks, redaction, purpose rules and retrieval permissions are enforced.

  4. 04
    Reason privately

    The approved model and private knowledge service analyze a bounded request.

  5. 05
    Validate the result

    Structured output is checked by policy-controlled and deterministic services.

  6. 06
    Review and record

    Authorized people decide; evidence references, versions and outcomes are auditable.

Why private

The public-AI security dilemma

Investigation evidence can contain material that should not be submitted to an uncontrolled external service.

Sensitive by nature

Source code, email, identities, configurations, database details and incident records are routine security inputs.

Customer-controlled processing

Prompts, retrieved knowledge and responses can remain within the deployment boundary and customer retention policy.

Network independence

Restricted-network and isolated operation can be designed with approved offline updates.

Shared service

One reasoning layer for every agent crew

Specialists use a common governed vocabulary and reasoning service without receiving unrestricted access to one another’s sources.

Postmaster

Explains possible internal or unintended email data exposure using selected message evidence.

Reviewer

Interprets code and application findings, relates security references and drafts remediation guidance.

Correlator

Connects relevant events across approved log sources and prepares investigation narratives.

Other crews

Future specialists connect through the same authenticated gateway, purpose controls and audit trail.

Practical baseline

Start with the smallest model that meets the task

A planning baseline balances analysis quality, response time, concurrency, power and acquisition cost. Final capacity is established by testing.

Standard

Quantized 12–14B model, one 24–32 GB GPU, 128 GB RAM and 2 TB NVMe.

Recommended planning baseline—not a performance guarantee

Professional

Quantized 24–32B model on a 48 GB ECC GPU with 128–256 GB RAM.

For stronger reasoning or moderate concurrency

Resilient

Two GPUs or independent nodes where redundancy, separation or higher concurrency is required.

Availability is optional and workload-led

Data residency

What goes where?

The deployment statement records the final retention, audit and export policy; these are the architectural defaults.

Source data stays put

Raw logs, mail stores and repositories remain in their authoritative source systems.

Evidence is selected

Only approved, minimized evidence enters private inference; credentials and secrets are excluded or masked.

Knowledge keeps permissions

Approved internal knowledge is indexed privately and retrieval preserves source access rules.

Telemetry stays local

Prompts and responses follow customer retention; support exports require approval; training is disabled unless separately governed.

Implementation journey

From discovery to governed operations

The engagement proves fit before production acceptance instead of treating a model name as the solution.

Discover and size

Confirm tasks, languages, boundaries, concurrency, context, response targets and existing infrastructure.

Validate and deploy

Benchmark candidate models and hardware, then install the approved release inside the controlled environment.

Integrate and accept

Connect approved crews, identity and knowledge; complete security, functional and performance acceptance.

Operate and govern

Monitor quality, apply controlled updates and retain tested rollback paths through the managed lifecycle.

Platform · Private AI Core

Size the system around your evidence and workload

The assessment defines the deployment class, model class, tested capacity envelope, availability design and implementation scope before hardware is committed.

Request a Private AI Sizing Assessment